Purabi Roy v. The State Of West Bengal And ORS.
rkd 19.08.2024 Ct.18 W.P.A. 19370 of 2024 Purabi Roy -vsState of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Subhas Chandra Atha, Ms. Payel Paramanik ....for the petitioner.
Mr. Saikat Chatterjee, Mr. Dipankar Ghosh ....for the State.
Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharyya, Mr. Bibek Dutta ....for the WBBSE.
Mr. Kanak Kiran Bandyopadhyay ....for the WBCSSC.
Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.
The grievance of the petitioner is that in spite of issuing recommendation memo by the Secretary, West Bengal Central School Service Commission vide memo dated 27th December, 2021 and the effort was made by the petitioner to join the post on transfer, petitioner found that the post was not lying vacant in Dudhunda Aloke Tirtha Vidyapith, District- Uttar Dinajpur.
The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that based on transfer application of the petitioner recommendation was made by the concerned authority of the Commission for transfer on 27th December, 2021 and the President, West
Bengal Board of Secondary Education issued transfer order on 10th December, 2021 but the petitioner could not join the post in Dudhunda Aloke Tirtha Vidyapith since the post was not lying vacant. Petitioner prays for direction upon the concerned respondent authorities for rerecommending her. The West Bengal Central School Service Commission is represented by learned advocate who submits that since the post to which petitioner was transferred was not available in spite of issuance of recommendation memo dated 27th December, 2021 petitioner needs to be rerecommended by the concerned authority of the Commission.
In view of aforesaid submissions made on behalf of the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the Chairman, West Bengal Central School Service Commission being respondent no.4 to re-recommend the petitioner to another nearby school considering the place of residence of the petitioner and preferably in the school which was also preferred by the petitioner while submitting application seeking transfer. The said respondent no.4 shall rerecommend by six weeks from the date of
communication of this order after granting opportunity to the petitioner to appear before the said respondent no.4 for choosing a school.
If ultimately re-recommendation is made by the respondent no.4, the concerned authority of the Board is also directed to issue transfer order in favour of the petitioner in order to facilitate the petitioner to join the post.
However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the learned Advocates for the parties on the usual undertakings.
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)