Rabin Pramanick @ Pramanik v. State Of West Bengal

25.09.2025 Item No.13 Ct.No.34 rc.

Reject C.R.M. (M) 1376 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Karimpur Police Station Case No. 57 of 2024 dated 24.03.2024.

And In Re :

Rabin Pramanick @ Pramanik ... Petitioner Mr. Jaydeep Biswas Mr. Asraf Mandal Mr. Kaushik Ghosh ... for the Petitioner Ms. Rita Datta ... for the State Mr. Soumya Basu Roy Chowdhury Mr. Abdul Aziz Mondal ...for the defacto complainant The petitioner is in custody for more than a year and prays for bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was no premeditation to murder the victim and the incident happened on the spur of the moment.

Learned counsels for the State and the defacto complainant oppose the prayer.

I have considered the material on record. The petitioner appears to be the principal assailant who dealt the fatal blow on the head of the victim, resulting in his death. The offending weapon has been recovered at the instance of

the petitioner. Eye witnesses have implicated the petitioner in the alleged offence. They are yet to be examined. In the event the petitioner is released on bail at this stage, there is every possibility of the witnesses being intimidated/ influenced. Offence, if proved, shall attract mandatory life imprisonment.

Considering the gravity of offence and prima role of the petitioner therein, prayer for bail is rejected at this stage. The bail application is disposed of.

Case Diary be returned.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)