Narayan Mondal @ Narayan Bramachari v. State Of West Bengal

26.08.2022.

19.

Ct.No.28.

as (Allowed) C.R.M. (DB) 2873 of 2022 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Sutahata P. S. Case No.129 of 2022 dated 21.05.2022 under Sections 447/436/325/307/427/506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4/6 of the POCSO Act and Sections 25(1)(a)/27 of the Arms Act.

In the matter of : Narayan Mondal @ Narayan Bramachari. .... Petitioner.

Mr. Jisan Iqubal Hossain, Mr. Debjyoti Maity.

...for the Petitioner.

Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, ld. A.P.P., Ms. Sonali Das, Ms. Sreeparna Das.

...for the State.

Heard the learned Counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.

Petitioner is in custody for 97 days. Investigation is complete.

Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

We have considered the materials on record. Injuries on the victim are not grievous. Keeping in mind the aforesaid fact, period of detention suffered by the petitioner and as investigation is complete, we are inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like

amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haldia, Purba Medinipur subject to condition that he shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the Trial Court without any justifiable cause, the trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.

This application for bail is, thus, disposed of. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)