Sk.Md. Nuruzzaman v. Rashmi Kamal, The District Majistrate,

09.06.2023 Court No.13 Item No.15 AP WPCRC 94 of 2023 In WPA 6696 of 2016 Sk. Md. Nuruzzaman Vs.

Dr. Rashmi Kamal and Anr.

Mr. Sk. Rejaul Alam ... For the Petitioner.

Mr. Arjun Roy Mukherjee ... For the Alleged Contemnors.

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of this Court has since been complied with. 2.

Hence, the contempt application shall stand disposed of.

3.

Personal presence of the alleged contemnors, if any, is dispensed with.

4.

Rule, if any, shall stand discharged.

5.

There will be no order as to costs.

6.

Interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated.

7.

All parties are to act on a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court.

(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)