Dilshad Alam v. State Of West Bengal

20.12.2021 sdas rejected C.R.M. 8451 of 2021 (via video conference) In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Asansol (S) Police Station Case No. 12 of 2020 dated 06.01.2020 under Sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In Re : Dilshad Alam ..... petitioner Mr. Sekhar Kumar Basu, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Diptangshu Basu Ms. Suchismita Dutta Mr. Pranidhi Singh ... for the petitioner Mr. Sudip Ghosh M. Apurba Kumar Datta ... for the State Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 681 days and has been falsely implicated in the instant case.

Learned Counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

We have considered the materials on record including statements of the eye-witnesses recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure implicating the petitioner in the murder of the deceased.

In view of the aforesaid fact and gravity of the offence, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The application for bail is, thus, rejected.

(Bivas Pattanayak, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)