Dilip Roy v. State Of West Bengal & ANR.

03.11.2022 SB Ct. No.236 CRR 2328 of 2010 CRAN 3 of 2022 Mr. Himangshu De Mr. Navanil De Mr. Rajeshwar Chakraborty Mr. Srinjan Ghosh Mr. Subhrajit Dey . ... for the petitioner Mr. N. P. Agarwala Mr. P. Bose ... for the State Re : CRAN 3 of 2022 The application for restoration is taken up for hearing.

Mr. De, learned advocate representing the petitioner while Mr. Agarwala learned counsel representing the State. None is appearing on behalf of the private opposite parties.

Sufficient cause has been shown for not appearing before the Court when the matter was called for hearing on 27.9.2021 I am inclined to restore the case to its original file and number.

Accordingly, the application being CRAN 3 of 2022 is thus disposed of.

Let the matter appear in the list on 17.11.2022 fairly at the top of the list.

Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record.

The notice directed to Smt. Shila Nag WBCS Project Director returned with an endorsement unserved. It appears that Smt. Nag set the criminal administration of justice into motion not in her personal capacity but as a public servant. Learned counsel for the State is directed to inform the project director about the next date fixed for hearing. (Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J.)