Piyashi Chakraborty @ Piashi Chakraborty v. Suman Nath & ANR

08.08.2024 Sl. No.60.

D/L.

Mithun.

Ct.No.32.

CRR/2730/2018 With IA No: CRAN/2/2019(Old No:CRAN2123/2019) Smt. Piyashi Chakraborty @ Piashi Chakraborty Vs.

Sri Suman Nath & Anr.

Mr. K. Shah, Ms. Rittwika Banerjee ...for opposite party No.1.

Despite administrative notice served upon the petitioner, no one represented on behalf of the petitioner and no accommodation is sought for.

Ms. Rittwika Banerjee, learned Advocate is appeared on behalf of the opposite party no.1.

It appears from the record that the petitioner/convict by filing this application challenged the order and judgment dated 28th August, 2018 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track, Court No.4 at Barrackpore in Criminal Appeal No.34 of 2017 which confirmed conviction and sentence dated 23rd August, 2017 passed by the learned 5th Court of Judicial Magistrate at Barrackpore in Complaint Case No.647/2010 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. Thereby the learned Magistrate found the present petitioner as a guilty for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and thereby convicted as per Section 255 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and convicted her to sentence to pay compensation of Rs.1,10,000/- to the complainant within one month from the date of the order, in default, to suffer Simple Imprisonment for two months. Despite filing this

application in the year 2018, it seems the petitioner is not interested to proceed with the case.

Accordingly, the instant revisional application is, thus, dismissed for default.

Let the order be communicated to the learned Court below for information.

Consequently, CRAN 2 of 2019 (Old No: CRAN 2123 of 2019) is also thus disposed of.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. ( Ajay Kumar Gupta, J. )