Anamika Ray v. Rajarshi Sengupta

12.09.2024 (D/L-1) Ct. No.4 (Naba) F.A.T. 437 of 2016 With CAN 2 of 2024 CAN 3 of 2024 Anamika Ray Vs.

Rajarshi Sengupta Mr. Sanjay Mukherjee, Mr. Kartik Kr. Roy, Mr. Ardan Kaji.

...for the Appellant Mr. Pranit Bag, Mr. Debabrata Das, Mr. Pradyot Kumar Das, Mr. Debdatta Saha.

...for the Respondent

1. The present appal arises out of decree of divorce obtained by the respondent (husband). The Trial Court has granted the decree on the grounds of desertion and cruelty.

2. The appellant (wife) has assailed the findings in the present appeal, during pendency of which the parties have come to an amicable settlement as is evident from the report of the mediation proceedings which is enclosed with the supplementary affidavit filed today. The report is dated 22.08.2024. As per the report, it is evident that the other proceedings arising out of the matrimonial dispute between the parties have also been resolved and are on the verge of being

given quietus.

Onetime alimony of Rs.

65,00,000/- has also been paid to the appellant, which she has accepted.

3. The learned counsel for the appellant, however, draws attention of the Court towards the final report of the mediation proceedings, specifically Paragraph (IX) thereof wherein the wife (appellant) has in specific terms recorded her acceptance of the decree of divorce, however disputing and without admitting the ingredient of cruelty.

4. By placing this fact on record and in view of the matter having been resolved, we find that nothing survives in the present appeal.

5. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

6. Pending applications stand disposed of.

7. Interim Order/s, if any, stand vacated.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)