Chanchal Halder v. Pratima Pandit

19.08.2025 Item no. 42.

Court No.6.

AB C. O. 3019 of 2025 Chanchal Halder Vs Pratima Pandit Mr. Dyutiman Banerjee, Mr. Salil Kr. Maiti, Ms. Pinki Saha .....for the Petitioner.

This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the husband praying for a direction upon the learned Additional District Judge, Haldia, Purba Medinipur to dispose of the Matrimonial Suit No.221 of 2019 expeditiously. The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is all along complying with the directions passed by the learned Trial Judge with regard to payment of alimony. He further submits that date has been fixed for further evidence of P.W.3.

In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed, there is no necessity to issue notice upon the opposite party.

However, the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with this order upon the opposite party or upon the learned advocates representing her before the learned Trial Court.

From the order-sheet appended to this revisional application, this Court finds that November 7, 2025 is fixed for further evidence of P.W.3.

In view thereof, C. O. No.3019 of 2025 stands disposed of by requesting the learned Additional District Judge, Haldia, Purba Medinipur to make an endeavour to dispose of the MAT Suit No.221 of 2019 as expeditiously as possible, but preferably within a period of nine months from the next date fixed without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, subject to the condition that the petitioner is not in default in payment of alimony.

The time limit has been fixed taking note of the fact that the suit is a matrimonial suit and is pending since 2019.

(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)