← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRR/2743/2018allowed

Vijay Kumar Singh v. State Of West Bengal

2021-09-01Hon'Ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh2 pages

C.R.R. No.2743 of 2018 (Via Video Conference) D/L 38.

September 1, 2021 Bpg.

In Re: An application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Vijay Kumar Singh

Versus

State of West Bengal Mr. Kaushik Gupta, Mr. Anirban Tarafder.

...for the petitioner.

Mr. Arijit Ganguly, Mr. Sandip Chakraborty.

...for the State.

Report submitted by the Officer-in-Charge of Cossipore Police Station be kept with the record.

Mr. Kaushik Gupta, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner draws attention of this Court to the order dated 13.08.2018 passed by the learned A.C.J.M, Sealdah. I find from the said order that no notice was issued by the court fixing date for granting opportunity to the petitioner to ventilate his grievance in respect of the conclusion arrived at by the Investigating Agency. The only satisfaction recorded by the learned Magistrate is that the result of the investigation was communicated to the defacto complainant by the Investigating Officer by e-mail. In view of the settled principles of law, the defacto complainant has a right of audience to file a protest petition in respect of the conclusion arrived at by the Investigating Agency.

Having regard to the same, I am of the view that the order dated 13.08.2018 is not sustainable in law and, as such, is liable to be set aside.

Accordingly, CRR 2743 of 2018 is allowed.

Pending application, if any, is consequently disposed of. The petitioner is directed to take steps for filing protest petition within a period of four weeks from date before the learned A.C.J.M., Sealdah.

The learned A.C.J.M., Sealdah, on receipt of such protest petition, will decide the same within a period of four weeks from the said date.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)