Theseus Doughlas Smith v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

08.03.2022 sb Ct 23

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 20434 of 2021 Theseus Doughlas Smith Vs.

State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Srinjoy Sengupta, Mr. Sourav Roy, Mr. Narattam Acharyya, Mr. Ankush Ghosh .... For the petitioner.

Mr. Ziaul Islam, Mr. A. H. Molla ... For the State.

Ms. Deblina Chattaraj ... For WBTC.

The report in the form of an affidavit filed by the respondent nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 is taken on record. A copy of the report has already been served upon the petitioner.

On a perusal of the report, it appears that the second Career Advancement Scheme (in short, CAS) has already been paid to the petitioner on 27th March, 2007. The petitioner is unable to demonstrate anything contrary to what has been stated by WBTC in the report. The petitioner is not, therefor, entitled to any relief, as claimed in the writ petition.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of without any order as to costs.

Since I have not called for any affidavits, save and except a report in the form of an affidavit, the allegations contained in the writ petition or in the report in the form of an affidavit are deemed to have not been admitted by the parties.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of necessary formalities.

(Arindam Mukherjee, J.)