Ruma Singh And ORS v. Union Of India

07.09.2022 sdas C.R.M.(DB) No. 2941 of 2022 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Jagaddal Police Station Case No. 345 of 2021 dated 03.05.2021 under Sections 448/427/325/307/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. And In Re : Ruma Singh & Ors. ..... petitioners Mr. Sandip Kumar Bhattacharyya Ms. Debanwita Pramanik ... for the petitioners Mr. Dhiraj Trivedi, learned ASG Mr. Dipankar Dandapat Mr. Sagar Saha ... for the State Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits he has no instruction to pray for bail on behalf of the petitioner nos. 1 and 3. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner nos. 1 and 3 is dismissed as not pressed.

Learned Counsel submits petitioner no. 2 is in custody for 336 days. She was implicated in the supplementary chargesheet filed by the C.B.I. Learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for C.B.I. opposes prayer for bail. He submits materials collected in the course of investigation including CCTV footage implicates the petitioner in the crime.

We have considered materials on record. Electronic evidence including CCTV footage disclose involvement of the petitioner no. 2 in the crime. Under such circumstances, we

are of the opinion that this is not a fit case to grant bail to the petitioner no. 2 at this stage.

The application for bail in so far as petitioner no. 2 is, thus, rejected.

(Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)