Sunil Mirdha v. State Of West Bengal

14.10.2025 Item No.1.

Ct. No. 5 ASR C.R.M.(M) 1443 of 2025 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

And In the matter of : Sunil Mirdha.............Petitioner Mr. Sanjib Kumar Dawn ....for the petitioner Mr. Madhusudhan Sur .......for the State It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent and has been in custody for about 240 days. He is languishing in jail as he is only a friend of the principal accused. He has no role to play in the murder of the victims.

Learned counsel for the State strongly opposes the prayer for bail and has produced the case diary. I have considered the materials on record particularly statements recorded under Section 161 of the CrPC of the witnesses, wherefrom it appears that the petitioner was last seen together along with the principal accused, who were entering into the room of the victims. Thereafter, dead bodies found from the room.

Furthermore, the incriminating offending weapon was

also recovered on the basis of the statement of the accused under Section 27 of the Evidence Act. Considering the above facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to allow the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)