Bakibullya Molla @ Bakibilla Molla v. State Of West Bengal

21.12.2021.

91.

as (Allowed).

C.R.M. 8586 of 2021 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Matia P. S. Case No.292 of 2021 dated 25.07.2021 under Sections 498A/406/325/313/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the matter of : Bakibullya Molla @ Bakibilla Molla. ... Petitioner.

Mr. Satadru Lahiri, Mr. Safdar Azam.

...for the Petitioner.

Ms. Faria Hossain, Mr. Aniket Mitra.

.....for the State.

Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in the instant case.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

We have considered the materials on record and keeping in mind the nature of allegations and as the medical papers do not disclose a case of forcible abortion, we are of the opinion custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary but the petitioner requires to co-operate with the investigation in accordance with law.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and on condition that he

shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a week until further orders and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Bivas Pattanayak,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)