Pampa Dey v. State Of West Bengal

05.09.2022 Serial no.23 Aloke CRM (A) 4199 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Bidhan Nagar North Police Station Case No. 55 of 2022 dated 01.04.2022 under Sections 420/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

-AndIn the matter of : Pampa Dey ... ... Petitioner Mr. Sandip Kr. Bhattacharyya, Advocate Ms. Debanwita Pramanik, Advocate Mr. Gourav Dutta, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Madhusudan Sur, ld. APP Mr. Manoranjan Mahata, Advocate ... ...For the State Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the husband was taken into custody. The petitioner was falsely implicated.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State submits that the petitioner is a bank employee. An amount of Rs.57 lakhs was taken for the purpose of granting loan to the victim. The petitioner is hand in glove.

The account of the petitioner was utilized for the said misdeed.

There are materials in the case diary implicating the petitioner. The petitioner is a bank employee. Her account was utilized.

In such circumstances, considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. CRM (A) 4199 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)