Swati Bhuin v. Ashoke Saha

12.05.2023 Ct. No. 32 rrc CPAN 847 of 2018 (Swati Bhuin Vs. Mr. Ashoke Saha) in WPA 25095 of 2017 Mr. Tara Pada Das ..... For the petitioner Dr. Sutanu Kumar Patra Ms. Supriya Dubey ..... For the alleged contemnor/respondent no. 2 Affidavit-of-service filed by the petitioner be kept on record.

The present contempt application has been preferred alleging violation of an order dated 13th November, 2017 passed in a writ petition being WPA 25095 of 2017. By the said order, the writ petition was disposed of directing the respondent no. 3 to communicate the marks obtained by the petitioner in the written test of 1st State Level Selection Test, 2016 (XI-XII) and the marks obtained by the last candidate who was called for verification (1st Phase), within a period of two weeks from the date of communication of this order.

Mr.

Das, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that in spite of communication of the order dated 13th November, 2017, the directions were not complied with and as such the petitioner was constrained to file the present contempt application in the month of September, 2018.

Dr. Patra, learned advocate appearing for the alleged contemnor no. 2 submits that immediately after communication of the order passed by this Court, the alleged contemnor by a letter dated 27th December, 2017 intimated to the petitioner the marks obtained by her in the written test of 1st State Level Selection Test, 2016 (XIXII) and the marks obtained by the last candidate who was called for verification (1st Phase). Let a copy of the said letter, as produced, be kept on record. A copy of the said letter has also been handed over to Mr. Das in Court today.

In reply, Mr. Das, however, submits that no such letter dated 27th December, 2017 was received by the petitioner.

Heard the learned advocates and considered the materials on record.

By the letter dated 27th December, 2017 the alleged contemnor has intimated the marks obtained by the petitioner in the written test of 1st State Level Selection Test, 2016 (XI-XII) and the marks obtained by the last candidate who was called for verification (1st Phase). The order of this Court has already been complied with and as such this Court is not inclined to proceed with the contempt application any further and the same is, accordingly, disposed of.

(Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)