← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPA/19332/2025disposed

Jaykrishna Baidya v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

2025-09-04Hon'Ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE 04.09.2025 rkd W.P.A. 19332 of 2025 Ct.18 DO Jaykrishna Baidya -vsState of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Firdous Samim, Ms. Gopa Biswas, Mr. Hasanuz Zaman, Ms. Ankita Ghosh ....for the petitioner.

Mr. Arka Kumar Nag, Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh ....for the WBCSSC.

1.

Matter is taken up for consideration out of turn in view of urgency as written examination in connection with 2nd State Level Selection Test for Recruitment of Assistant Teachers, 2025 for Classes IX & X in Government aided/sponsored schools is scheduled on 7th September, 2025.

2.

It is submitted by the learned advocate representing the petitioner that while submitting online application form inadvertently petitioner stated English as "medium of vacancy applying for" instead of Bengali. Petitioner wants to be treated as a candidate who will fill up OMR as Bengali medium candidate.

3.

West Bengal Central School Service Commission is represented by learned advocate who submits that

petitioner applied under English medium while submitting online application indicating English against "medium of vacancy applying for" and in absence of necessary direction of Court petitioner is to be treated as English medium candidate.

4.

Having considered the respective submissions made on behalf of the parties, Court finds that within time petitioner submitted application form online and petitioner on being found to be eligible candidate to offer his candidature was supplied Admit Card which is at page 44 of the writ petition. 5.

West Bengal Central School Service Commission is directed to treat the petitioner as Bengali medium candidate instead of English medium.

6.

Leave is granted to the learned advocate representing the petitioner to communicate this order to the West Bengal Central School Service Commission without waiting for server copy of the order.

7.

Writ petition stands disposed of.

8.

However, there shall be no order as to costs. 9.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the learned Advocates for the parties on the usual undertakings.

(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)