← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPA(P)/438/2022disposed

Avijit Sahu And ORS v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

2022-09-26Hon'Ble Chief Justice Prakash Shrivastava,Hon'Ble Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj2 pages

September 26, 2022 Sl. No.19 Court No.1 s.biswas WPA (P) 438 of 2022 Avijit Sahu and others vs.

The State of West Bengal and others Mr. Soumen Kr. Dutta, Mr. Sabyasachi Bhattacharjee, Mr. Subham Dutta, Advocate ... for the petitioners Mr. Amitesh Banerjee, Sr. Standing Counsel Mr. Sudhadev Adak, Advocates ... for the State Mr. Atarup Banerjee, Mr. Abu Sohel, Mr. Raju Bhattacharyya, Advocates ... for the respondent No.7 Mr. Koushik Chatterjee, Mr. Nilanjan Adhikari, Advocates ... for the Municipality The affidavit of service filed by the petitioners is taken on record.

The allegation of the petitioners is that on a public land in R.S. Plot No.79 correspondent to L.R. Plot No.96 in Mouza- Sub-Division of Kumarpur, J.L. No.368, with the classification as Bastu, an unauthorized and illegal construction has been made by the local leaders of one of the political parties. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners have already made the representation dated 8th August, 2022 to the respondent No.2 (The District Magistrate/Collector, Purba Medinipur), but no decision on that representation has been taken.

Private respondent No.7 has denied the said allegation.

WPA(P) 438 of 2022 Having regard to the nature of controversy involved in the matter, we are of the opinion that the representation submitted by the petitioners needs to be examined by the respondent No.2 in accordance with law.

Hence, we dispose of the present petition by directing the respondent No.2 to duly consider the petitioners' representation dated 8th August, 2022 and carry out spot inspection, if required and take appropriate decision in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties. If any unauthorized construction on the public land is found then respondent No.2 will take expeditious appropriate steps in accordance with law to remove the same.

Let this exercise be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on usual undertaking.

(Prakash Shrivastava, C.J.) (Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.)