Najimul Haque v. State Of West Bengal

23.12.2021 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M. 8702 of 2021 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Harishchandrapur Police Station Case No. 545 of 2021 dated 22.07.2021 under Sections 420/406/409/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In Re : Najimul Haque ...... petitioner Mr. Sujoy Sarkar ....for the petitioner Mr. Saibal Bapuli Mr. Soumik Ganguly ....for the State Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner was falsely implicated. The petitioner was working as a 'Data Entry Operator'. He was acting at the dictate of the 'Pradhan'.

Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the contents of the case diary. Considering the nature of the incident and considering the fact that the petitioner is the 'Data Entry Operator' and considering the involvement of the petitioner in the incident, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional court on every date fixed and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)