Ranjit Roy Bir v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

14.07.2025 Sl. No.51 AMR Ct.No.655 CRA 525 of 2016 In the matter of : Ranjit Roy Bir .... Appellant Ms. Anwesha Chakrabarty (via VC) ....for the Appellant Ms. Debjani Sahu ...for the State

1. Learned advocate for the appellant is present through virtual mode.

2. State is represented.

3. A report submitted by the Superintendent, Jalpaiguri Central Correctional Home is handed over by the learned advocate for the State during course of hearing.

4. It appears from the said report that the appellant/convict had already served out the sentence as imposed by the learned Trial Court in the impugned judgment and order of conviction and he was released from the Correctional Home on 21.11.2020.

5. As the appellant/convict had already served out the sentence, the present appeal becomes infractuous.

6. Accordingly, the instant appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed affirming the impugned judgment and order of conviction passed by the learned Trial Court dated 20.06.2016 and 21.06.2016 in connection with Sessions Case No. 183 of 2014 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 2(7)/2014.

7. The report submitted by the Superintendent, Jalpaiguri Correctional Home be kept with the record.

8. Thus, the instant criminal appeal be and the same is hereby disposed of.

9. Let a copy of this order along with TCR be sent down to the learned Trial Court immediately.

10. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon complying with all legal formalities. (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)