Sulekha Bagdi v. Abdul Kasem

27.06.2022.

C.P.A.N. 2348 of 1998 In WPA 8020 of 1996 Sulekha Bagdi Vs.

Abdul Kasem ab Ct. 40 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)