Sanatan Madiya @ Sanatan Mariya v. State Of West Bengal

17.09.2025 Item No.72 Ct.No.34 rc.

Reject C.R.M. (M) 1479 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Rampurhat Police Station Case No. 201 of 2025 dated 28.04.2025.

And In Re :

Sanatan Madiya @ Sanatan Mariya ... Petitioner Mr. Samrat Banerjee ... for the Petitioner Mr. Avishek Sinha Ms. Rajnandini Das ... for the State Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty Mr. S.S.Saha ...for the defacto complainant The petitioner is in custody for about five months and prays for bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and is not involved in the alleged offence. He is a resident of Jharkhand. Learned counsel for the State and the defacto complainant oppose the prayer.

I have considered the material on record. A person was shot dead. The fire arm has been recovered at the instance of the petitioner. The bullet recovered from the body of the victim has matched with the said fire arm.

The petitioner is in custody for about five months. Offence, if proved, shall attract mandatory life imprisonment. In view of the above, prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

The bail application is disposed of.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)