← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRR/2631/2021disposed

Hasem Mondal@Hasam And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

2022-02-18Hon'Ble Justice Jay Sengupta2 pages

NB 18.02.2022 CRR 2631 of 2021 Ct. No. 39 In the matter of:- Hasem Mondal @ Hasam & Ors. ...petitioners Mr. Sumanta Das.

...for the petitioners.

Mr. Bidyut Kumar Roy, Mr. Arabinda Manna.

....for the State.

This is an application seeking an expeditious disposal of a proceeding in which a charge sheet was submitted under Sections 20(b)(ii) (c) and 29 of the NDPS Act.

Let a copy of this application be served upon Mr. Bidyut Kumar Roy and Mr. Arabinda Manna, learned Counsels who ordinarily appear on behalf of the State. Let them represent the State. Their engagement may be regularised by the competent authority of the State in due course. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits as follows. The petitioner is an accused in this case. He is in custody since 06.07.2020, the date on which the FIR was registered. A charge sheet was submitted in 2020. In all, six witnesses are proposed to be examined in this case. On 09.11.2021, charges were framed. However, till date, not a single witness has been examined in this case. The matter has remained pending for no fault on the part of the present petitioner. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that the State would not come in the way if a direction is passed to expedite the proceeding.

I have heard the submissions of the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the State and have perused the revision petition.

It appears that some delay has been occasioned in concluding the trial, especially considering the fact that the petitioner is languishing in custody since 06.07.2020.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the learned Court is requested to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties, preferably within a period of ten months from the resumption of normal functioning of the learned Trial Court.

With the above observations, the revisional application is disposed of.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.

(Jay Sengupta, J.)