Sk Firoz @ Sk Saddam v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

17.09.2025 Item No.74 Ct.No.34 rc.

Allowed C.R.M. (M) 1482 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Khanakul Police Station Case No. 383 of 2025 dated 27.05.2025.

And In Re :

Sk. Firoz @ Sk. Saddam ... Petitioner Mr. Niladri Sekhar Ghosh Mr. Souvik Dey Ms. Laboni Sikder ... for the Petitioner Mr. Sharequl Haque ... for the State Mrs. Priyanka Dutta ...for the defacto complainant Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for more than sixty days. Charge sheet has been submitted. He has been falsely implicated. His further detention is not required. He may be released on bail.

Learned counsels for the State and the defacto complainant oppose the prayer.

I have considered the material on record. There was a consensual relationship between the petitioner and the

victim which turned sour subsequently. The extracts from the mobile phone of the victim's brother Rakibul produced by the defacto complainant prima facie suggest several conversation between the victim and the petitioner. Though it is alleged that several photographs of the victim were circulated in social media, the said allegation does not find support in the Case Diary. The victim was a major at the time of the incident and was aware of the consequences thereof. Charge sheet has been submitted. Material available in the Case Diary does not justify further detention of the petitioner.

Accordingly prayer for bail is allowed.

The petitioner Sk. Firoz @ Sk. Saddam, be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arambagh, Hooghly subject to condition that he shall appear before the learned trial Court on every date of hearing. He shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the learned trial Court on any date without justifiable cause, the learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court. The application for bail is, thus, disposed of.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)