← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPCRC/132/2024disposed

Bhakti Pada Samanta v. Gopal Routh And ANR

2025-04-16Hon'Ble Justice Shampa Sarkar1 pages

April 16, 2025 Sl. No.1 Court No.36 s.biswas WPCRC 132 of 2024 In WPA 13691 of 2021 Bhakti Pada Samanta vs.

Gopal Routh and another Ms. Senjuti Sengupta Mr. Rananeesh Guha Thakurta ... for the applicant Mr. Rajib Mukherjee Ms. Shreyasi Bhaduri ... for the alleged contemnors Mr. Suman Dey ... for the alleged contemnor no.4 The pension payment order issued by the Office of the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, has been served upon Mr.

Rananeesh Guha Thakurta, learned advocate for the applicant. It is submitted that gratuity has been paid.

As the pension payment order has been issued, nothing remains to be decided in the contempt application. Needless to mention that the authority shall disburse the retirement dues in terms of the PPO along with the arrears, if any.

Accordingly, the contempt application is disposed of. Contempt proceedings are dropped. Rule is discharged.

(Shampa Sarkar, J.)