← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(M)/1491/2025rejected

Rabindranath Sarkar @ Palash v. State Of West Bengal

2025-09-19Hon'Ble Justice Suvra Ghosh2 pages

September 19, 2025 16 ARDR (Rejected) CRM (M) 1491 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Memari Police Station Case No. 610 of 2022 dated 29/9/2022 under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In Re :

Rabindranath Sarkar @ Palash ... petitioner.

Adv. Kunal Ganguly, ... for the petitioner.

Adv. Abhishek Sinha, Adv. Debjani Sahu, ... for the State.

The petitioner is in custody for about three years and prays for bail.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. I have considered the material on record.

One of the witnesses has seen the petitioner enter the house of the victim and leave the said house after some time on the relevant date. The wallet of the petitioner was recovered from the place of occurrence a few days after the incident. This Court is informed that the prosecution proposes to examine 20 witnesses out of whom 11 witnesses have been examined so far. The petitioner is in custody for about three years. Offence, if proved, shall attract mandatory life imprisonment.

Considering the gravity of the offence and prima facie involvement of the petitioner therein, prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

The application for bail is disposed of.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)