Nikhil Banka v. Aarti Banka

23.02.2022 Ct. 21 D/L 110 ab C.O. 2264 of 2021 (Via Video Conference) Nikhil Banka -VsAarti Banka Mr. Dhiraj Trivedi, Mr. Bikas Kumar Singh, ... for the petitioner Mr. Dhiraj Trivedi, learned advocate appears for the petitioner.

Record shows that the notice of this application has not been served on the opposite party.

The petitioner by filing the present application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has prayed for expeditious disposal of Matrimonial Suit No. 29 of 2020, pending before the learned Judge First Track 2nd Court at Sealdah.

The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the learned Court below has been granting unnecessary adjournments and due to which, there is a delay in disposal of the case and such delay is causing hardship to the petitioner.

Having regard to the nature of relief claimed by the petitioner, being a prayer for expeditious disposal of the matrimonial suit, I do not find any need to serve notice of the present application on the opposite party and it is not likely to cause any prejudice to the interest of the opposite party. Therefore, service of notice upon the opposite party is dispensed with.

The learned Judge First Track 2nd Court at Sealdah, is requested to dispose of Matrimonial Suit No. 29 of 2020, as expeditiously as possible and in any event, within a period of six months from the date of communication of this order, without granting any adjournment whatsoever to any of the parties but giving regard to the diary maintained by him/her.

Accordingly, the revisional application being C.O. 2264 of 2021 is disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Parties are to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of all formalities.

( Kesang Doma Bhutia, J.)