Dhiren Pramanik v. State Of West Bengal

04.01.2022 Serial no.5 Aloke (Through Video Conference) Ct. No. 29 CRM 8864 of 2021 In re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

-AndIn the matter of : Dhiren Pramanik ... ...Petitioner Mr. M. Chatterjee, Advocate Mr. G. Nure Imrohi, Advocate ... ... For the petitioner Mr. Sanjay Bardhan, Advocate Mr. Nirupam Dhali, Advocate ... ... For the State The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

In answer to a query from the Court, learned Advocate appearing for the State submits that the petitioner is not named in the prosecution report.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the jurisdictional Court issued warrant of arrest.

It appears from the records that the petitioner is not named either in the first information report or in the prosecution report.

The petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate steps before the Court issuing the warrant of arrest, in accordance with law.

CRM 8864 of 2021 is disposed of accordingly.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)