Monai @ Monar Ali Sk @ Mona v. State Of West Bengal
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction 30-08-2023 Item no.63 Subrata Bhattacharyya CRR No.3094 of 2023 Monai @ Monar Ali Sk @ Mona -vsThe State of West Bengal Mr. Sarbananda Sanyal ...for the petitioner Mr. S.G. Mukherjee, PP Mr. Saryati Dutta ... for the State The present revisional application was preferred for quashing of the proceedings of NGR No.899 of 2019 under section 110 CrPC. In the said case the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Katwa, Purba Bardhaman passed an order dated August 27, 2019 wherein he directed the present petitioner to execute a bond with sureties of any Group A Government Officer for his good behaviour for a period of two years.
A report was called for. Accordingly, Mr Public Prosecutor submitted a report of the inspector-in-charge, Katwa police station wherein a list of 34 cases were enclosed. From the said list it reflects another NGR No.894 of 2019 was initiated against the petitioner and there are at least more than 34 cases pending against the petitioner. So far as the proceedings are concerned, relating to section 110 CrPC, I am of the view that since 4 years have passed from initiation and registration of the case under section 110 CrPC, Case No. 899/2019 be dropped.
However, having regard to the series of cases pending against the present petitioner, I invoke my powers under section 482 CrPC and direct that in all the criminal cases which are pending against the petitioner, a condition would be added that the petitioner will not enter the district of Purba Bardhaman till further orders of this court. The petitioner submits that he will stay within the district of
Nadia. He shall, therefore, furnish his address to the officer-in-charge or inspector-in-charge of the locality where he would be residing and furnish the same address to the court where the proceedings are pending. The petitioner shall, before leaving the district of Nadia, enter the jurisdiction of Purba Bardhaman (only limited to these two districts) for the purposes of the cases pending in Court. He would inform the inspector-in-charge or officer-in-charge of the Katwa police station.
It is clarified that for the purposes of attending the court proceedings, the petitioner would be at liberty obviously to enter the jurisdiction of Purba Bardhaman subject to informing the same to the inspector-in-charge or officer-in-charge of the concerned police station where he would be residing for the present by an order of this court. The petitioner shall inform his place of residence to the inspector-incharge of Katwa police station within a week from being released from custody.
Since this court is of the opinion that Case No.899/2019 and the consequential orders of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Katwa no longer exist, the petitioner shall be immediately released, if he is not wanted in any other case.
Report filed on behalf of the State be taken on record. With the above observations, CRR No.3094 of 2023 stands disposed of.
Parties are to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. Certified copy of this order, if applied for, shall be made available.
[Tirthankar Ghosh, J]