← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPA/20084/2025dismissed for default

Manabes Bera v. Union Of India And ORS.

2026-06-11Hon'Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya1 pages

WPA 20084 of 2025 Item- A106.

11-06-2026 Manabes Bera

Versus

The Union of India & Ors.

Ct. 19 sg Mr. Mohit Gupta Mr. Bebashish Basak ...for the respondent nos.1-4 The petitioner has claimed compensation alleging that the plots of the petitioner have been utilized for the purpose of a Railway project.

The written instruction filed by the learned Advocate for the Union of India is taken on record.

The learned Advocate for the Union of India submits that the plots of the petitioner as stated in paragraph 4 of the writ petition have never been acquired by the Railway Authorities.

Such submission of the learned Advocate for the Railway Authorities is placed on record.

None appears on behalf of the petitioner at the time of call. No accommodation has been sought for either. Since the petitioner is not represented, the writ petition stands dismissed for default.

(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)