← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(M)/1500/2025allowed

Ali Mohammad Aby Sayed @ Kochi @ Ali Mohammad Abu Said @ Ali Md Abu Sayeed @ Kachi v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

2025-10-29Hon'Ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)3 pages

29.10.2025 SL No.5 Court No.446 (gc) (Allowed) CRM (M) 1500 of 2025 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Raghunathganj Police Station Case No.777 of 2024 dated 28.06.2024 under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Charge Sheet submitted under Sections 376/417 of the IPC. And In the matter of : Ali Mohammad Aby Sayed @ Kochi @ Ali Mohammad Abu Said @ Ali Md Abu Sayeed @ Ali Mahammad Said @ Kachi - Petitioner.

Mr. Tapodip Gupta, ....For the Petitioner.

Mr. Arijit Ganguly, Ms. Puja Goswami ....For the State.

Mr. Subarna Banik ...For the Victim.

1.

The status report filed in Court be kept with the record. 2.

Heard the submission of both the learned Advocates. 3.

This is an application for renewal of his prayer since bail application was earlier rejected. The petitioner is in custody for 9 months 15 days. The trial has been progressed substantially and the next date is fixed for evidence of CSW 13 and 14, that is the police personnel, on 1st December, 2025.

4.

It is submitted on behalf of the de facto complainant that the present petitioner is the civic volunteer and his influence over the police station cannot be ignored.

5.

At this stage, considering the period of detention and that the trial is on the verge of completion Court is of the view that the prayer of the petitioner be allowed, hence, the application for bail is allowed subject to stringent condition.

6.

Accordingly, the petitioner, namely, Ali Mohammad Aby Sayed @ Kochi @ Ali Mohammad Abu Said @ Ali Md Abu Sayeed @ Ali Mahammad Said @ Kachi, be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jangipur, Murshidabad.

7.

The petitioner will not enter into the jurisdiction of Raghunathganj police station and he will provide residential address and mobile number to the concerned local police station and should be available as and when required by the police authorities.

8.

The petitioner shall appear before the learned trial Court on each and every date of hearing until further orders . 9.

The petitioner shall not intimidate or try to threat witnesses and the victim, and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

10.

In the event the petitioner fails to comply with any of the conditions stipulated above, the trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.

11.

The application for bail is, thus, disposed of. 12.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

13.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), J.)