Pradip Kumar Bhowmik v. Union Of India And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Ct.551 10.11.25 Item No.02 Sws.M WPA 20291 of 2025 Pradip Kumar Bhowmik Vs The Union of India and Ors.

Mr. Himangshu Kumar Ray Mr. Gaurav Chakraborty ...for the petitioner Mr. Prithu Dhudhoria ...for the respondents 1.

This matter was mentioned for correction. Mr. Dhudhoria, learned advocate appearing for the respondent/revenue authorities submits that his name has not been recorded in the order dated November 4, 2025, although he was assisting Mr. Dutt, learned advocate for the respondent/revenue authorities on the said date.

2.

The petitioner is represented through Mr. Ray, learned advocate.

3.

In view of the aforesaid submissions, let the name of Mr.

Prithu Dhudhoria, learned advocate be incorporated in the array of the advocates representing the respondents in the order dated November 4, 2025 and the order be corrected accordingly. The other portion of the order shall remain unchanged.

(Om Narayan Rai , J.)