← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM/9041/2021rejected

Gofur Sk. v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

2022-01-11Hon'Ble Justice Subrata Talukdar,Hon'Ble Justice Krishna Rao2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction 11-01-2022 F.B./gsd Item no.07 C.R.M. No. 9041 of 2021 Gofur Sk.

-vsThe State of West Bengal & Ors.

(Via video conference) In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 CrPC in connection with Kaliganj P.S. Case No. 07 of 2015 (corresponding to G. R. Case No.63/2015) dated 03.01.2015, District Nadia under sections 363/366/120(B)/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Mr. Rajdeep Majumdar Mr. Amanul Islam ...for the petitioner. Mr. Rudradipta Nandy ... for the State.

This is an application for bail. The application arises out of Kaliganj P.S. (District-Nadia) Case No. 07 of 2015 dated 03.01.2015 under Sections 363/366/120(B)/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been in custody for one year and seven months. It is submitted that the victim girl returned to her house on her own accord and the charge of kidnapping and wrongful confinement is without any basis. On behalf of the Prosecution it is submitted that the petitioner is one of the three members of a gang and the girl was kidnapped for the purpose of trafficking.

The girl escaped from the confinement and has returned to her house.

It is further submitted that the petitioner was absconding for

nearly five and half years before being arrested. It is submitted that the charge-sheet has already been filed. It is also submitted that out of the three members of the alleged gang, one of the members is still absconding.

Heard.

Considered the materials placed along with case diary. In view of the facts and circumstances of the alleged kidnap and confinement made out with the attending facts and circumstances as disclosed from the conduct of the petitioner, this Court is not persuaded to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail is rejected.

This Court however requests the Competent Court to take steps to expedite the trial, subject to its Board.

With the aforesaid, CRM 9041 of 2021 is dismissed. (Krishna Rao, J.) (Subrata Talukdar, J.)