← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM/9066/2021rejected

Bapan Sk. @ Bapon Sekh v. State Of West Bengal

2021-12-30Hon'Ble Justice Shampa Sarkar,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De3 pages

30.12.2021 sdas/Aj Rejected C.R.M. 9066 of 2021 (via video conferencing) In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Raninagar Police Station Case No. 436 of 2019 dated 30.08.2019 under Sections 326/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act and adding Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act. And In Re : Bapan Sk. @ Bapon Sekh ..... petitioner Mr. Tapodip Gupta, Mr. Anjan Bhattacharyya.

... for the petitioner Mr. Swapan Banerjee, Ld. P.P. (in-charge) Ms. Baishakhi Chatterjee, Mr. Pratick Bose.

... for the State Considering the statement of the injured, prima facie records revealing involvement of the petitioner in dealing with narcotic substance above commercial quantity and in view of statutory restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The application for bail is, thus, rejected.

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.) (Shampa Sarkar, J.)

C.R.M. 192 of 2018 In Re.: An application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 05.01.2018 in connection with Karimpur Police Station Case No. 136 of 2012 dated 03.07.2012 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code. And In Re : Rabish Kumar Upadhyay ..... petitioner Mr. Asraf Ali ... for the petitioner Mr. Debojyoti Deb ... for the State Having considered the materials on record prima facie disclosing involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime of misappropriation of monies of the innocent depositors and the fact that the petitioner has absconded for a protracted period of time, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

The application for bail is, thus, rejected. (Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)