Mihir Mandal And ORS. v. The State Of West Bengal And ORS.

20.09.2024 Item No. 28 Crt.No.02 b.r. WPA 21158 of 2024 Mihir Mondal & Ors.

-vsThe State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Kumar Jyoti Tiwari Mr. Panchanan Hajra ..... for the petitioners.

Mr. Somnath Ganguly, Ld.AGP Mr. Rajaram Banerjee .... For the State respondents.

Affidavit of service filed in Court today, is taken on record.

Mr. Kumar Jyoti Tiwari, learned counsel appears for the petitioners.

Mr.

Somnath Ganguly, learned Additional Government Pleader with Mr. Rajaram Banerjee, learned State advocate appears for the respondent nos. 1 to 7. The land of the petitioners was requisitioned in connection with Requisition Case No. I-40/1975-76. Steps were taken in accordance with law for acquisition of the land but subsequently the requisition lapsed by operation of law. The admitted position is that the land has not been acquired.

Mr. Somnath Ganguly, learned State counsel submits whether the land has at all been utilized or if

any in part it has been utilized, the same has to be ascertained.

In view of the above and after considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties the following directions are passed:- (i) The respondent no.5 upon issuing a prior notice to the petitioners shall cause an immediate physical inspection on the subject land and shall demarcate the same showing whether the land has been utillised in totality or in part. This exercise shall be carried out by the respondent no.5 positively within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order;

(ii) The respondent no.5 then shall place the report before the respondent no.2 within a period of one week from the date of the said physical inspection shall take place;

(iii) The respondent no.2 if then is of the opinion that the entire land is utilized or any part of its utilise, shall take all necessary steps for Direct Purchase of the utilized land or the part thereof as the case may be, at the present market value in accordance with law;

(iv) The entire exercise shall be completed by the respondent no.2 positively within a period of four weeks from the date of receiving reports from the respondent no.5;

(v) In the event, it is found that the land or any part of it is not utilized, the same shall have to be handed over to the petitioners free from any encumbrances and encroachment, if any. Such handing over of land shall take place positively within a further period of six weeks from the date of arriving of the finding of the respondent no.2 as mentioned in Clause (iii) herein above;

(vi) Following the decision of the respondent no.2, the respondent no.5 shall deposit the money with the respondent no.2 positively within a period of two weeks from the date of communication of the decision of the respondent no.2 to the respondent no.5;

(vii) The respondent no.2 then shall disburse the entire amount to the petitioners on account of Direct Purchase payable to the petitioners in accordance with law positively within a period of two weeks from the date of receiving the fund from the respondent no.5.

The petitioners submit that they have already received the requisition compensation in accordance with law and they have no grievance on this score. Since affidavits are not called for, the allegations made in this writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted by the respondents.

The report filed Mr. Ganguly, learned State Counsel dated September 18, 2024 issued under the signature of the respondent no.4, is taken on record. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition, WPA 21158 of 2024 stands disposed of, without any order as to costs.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties expeditiously, on compliance of usual legal formalities.

(Aniruddha Roy, J.)