Manirul Islam @ Manju And ANR. v. State Of West Bengal

22.09.2025 jb.

jdt.

C.R.M. (M) 1550 of 2025 In Re : An Application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure/under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Itahar Police Station Case No.

of dated 10.04.2024 under Sections 341/348/326/354/427/506/307/34 with added Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In Re : Manirul Islam @ Manjul & Anr.

Mr. Tapan Dutta Gupta Parvej Anam Ms. Rituparna Ghosh Mr. Sourav Sardar ... For the Petitioners.

Mr. Joydeep Roy Mr. Prakash Mishra ... For the State Mr. Ashok Das Ms. Hasi Jana ... For the Defacto Complainant Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the first petitioner is in custody for more than a year and the second petitioner is in custody for more than a month. The petitioners have been falsely implicated. The petitioners pray for bail.

Learned counsels for the State and the defacto complainant oppose the prayer.

The bail prayer of the first petitioner was turned down by this Court earlier considering the material on record. There is no change in the circumstances of the case which warrants a favour order for the first petitioner at this stage. With regard to the second petitioner, he was absconding for more than a year for which trial was protracted. Warrants of

arrest, proclamation and attachment were issued against him. He was arrested on 5th October, 2025 and is in custody since then. 7 co-accused are still absconding. The second petitioner does not appear to be similarly circumstanced with the co-accused who have been granted bail earlier. Considering the material on record and extent of complicity of the petitioners in the alleged crime, prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

The application for bail is disposed of.

Case diary be returned.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)