Amit Kumar Roy And Another v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction Appellate Side

Present:

The Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta CRR 3914 of 2025 With CRAN 1 of 2025 Amit Kumar Roy & Anr.

Vs.

State of West Bengal & Anr.

For the Petitioners : Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya Mr. Rajib Mullick Ms. Sonia Mukherjee Mr. Subham Chatterjee For the O.P. 2 : Mr. Amit Kumar Nag Mr. Subhajit Ghosh For the State : Mr. Joydeep Biswas Ms. Suparna Chatterjee Heard on : 24.09.2025 Judgment on : 24.09.2025 Jay Sengupta, J.:

This is an application praying for quashing of a proceeding in C.G.R. Case No. 1460 of 2025 pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, South 24 Parganas arising out of Karaya P.S. Case No. 129 dated 10.05.2025 under Sections 189 (2), 189(6), 189(4), 351(3) and 333 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record.

Report filed on behalf of the State is also taken on record. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the present case arose from a dispute between landlord and tenant. Civil cases were filed. All have been finally settled and compromised between the private parties. As such, the impugned proceeding ought to be quashed on the ground of compromise.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the de-facto complainant/private opposite party supports such contentions of the petitioner and submits that settlement and compromise has been arrived at between the private parties of all disputes that had led to the registration of the FIR. The impugned proceeding, therefore, may be quashed on the ground of settlement.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that the State would not come in the way if a settlement has been arrived at between the private parties.

It appears that a settlement and compromise has indeed been arrived at between the private parties of all disputes that had led to the initiation of the impugned proceeding.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the impugned proceeding is quashed on the ground of settlement. With these observations, the revisional application and the connected application are disposed of.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this judgment be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible. (Jay Sengupta, J.) tbsr/9