Rama Sengupta v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

36.

36.

(DL) (DL) 25.09.2025 25.09.2025 Ct. No. 18 (ARPAN) W.P.A. 20938 OF 2025 RAMA SENGUPTA VS.

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & OTHERS Mr. Banshi Badan Maity, Adv.

...for the Petitioner 1.

Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. In spite of service of notice State respondents are not represented.

2.

The petitioner is a retired Assistant Teacher, who superannuated on 30th April, 2002 and got the benefit under the Contributory Provident Fund Scheme (CPF). Subsequently, petitioner exercised option to come under the Pension-cum-Gratuity Scheme in terms of Government notification dated 13th June, 2014 which was issued in terms of the judgment of the Special Bench dated 16th July, 2013 passed on intra-court appeal being A.P.O. No.94 of 2009 (State of West Bengal & Ors. v. Abhijit Baidya & Ors.).

3.

It has also been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that as per demand of the State respondents, petitioner has deposited the amount along with interest and additional interest which she received under CPF Scheme.

4.

However, the grievance of the petitioner is after taking steps in terms of the said notification dated

13th June, 2014 by issuing pension payment order dated 22nd May, 2015, pensionary benefit was sanctioned in favour of the petitioner not from the date following the date of petitioner's retirement but from the date of refund which petitioner made after exercising option in terms of the said notification dated 13th June, 2014. Petitioner claims issuance of revised pension payment order thereby sanctioning pensionary benefits from the date following the date of petitioner's superannuation based on the judgment of the Special Bench dated 30th September, 2019 passed on intra-court appeal being A.P.O. No.121 of 2007.

5.

This Court has heard the learned advocate representing the petitioner and has perused the relevant materials available on record.

6.

It is not the case that the petitioner did not exercise option within time in terms of the said notification dated 13th June, 2014 and the petitioner on duly exercising option in terms of notification dated 13th June, 2014 switched over from CPF to Pension-cumGratuity Scheme. On placing reliance on paragraph 55 of the judgment of the Special Bench dated 30th September, 2019, this Court does not find any impediment in extending the benefit of pension to

the petitioner from the date following the date of her retirement provided exercise of option is made within time and refund has been made as per the calculation of the State respondents.

7.

Accordingly, this Court directs the State respondents to issue revised pension payment order in favour of the petitioner within twelve (12) weeks from the date of communication of this order thereby extending the benefit of pension from the date following the date of petitioner's superannuation.

8.

With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

9.

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.

(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)