← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(M)/1570/2025allowed

Parimal Roy @ Laltu v. State Of West Bengal

2025-09-19Hon'Ble Justice Suvra Ghosh2 pages

19.09.2025 Ct.No.34 b.das Allowed C.R.M. (M) 1570 of 2025 In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 filed in connection with New Alipore P.S. Case No.138 of dated 26.06.2019 under Sections 364A/170/382/387/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. And In Re :Parimal Roy @ Laltu ... Petitioner.

Mr. Apalak Basu Mr. Shwashwitwik Chatterjee ... for the Petitioner.

Mr. Iqbal Kabir Ms. Atulya Sinha ... for the State.

Heard learned counsels for the parties.

The petitioner is in custody for more than 6 years and seeks parity with the co accused who have been granted bail earlier solely on the ground of prolonged incarceration. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. I have considered the material on record. On merits, the petitioner does not deserve a fabourable order at this stage. He is in custody for more than 6 years. The prosecution proposes to examine 10 more witnesses. Possibility of completion of trial in near future is bleak. Co accused who are on bail are similarly placed with the petitioner insofar as their period of incarceration is concerned.

Considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner and slow progress in trial, this Court is inclined to

hold that petitioner is entitled to bail solely on the touchstone of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, without going into the merits of the case.

Accordingly, prayer for bail is allowed.

The petitioner namely Parimal Roy @ Laltu be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore subject to condition that he shall remain within the jurisdiction of Behala P.S. except for the purpose of appearing before the learned trial Court on every date of hearing. He shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever. In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the learned trial Court on any date fixed by the learned trial Court without justifiable cause, the learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.

The application for bail is thus disposed of. Case Diary be returned.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)