Kakali Rakshit v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

27.09.2023 Court No. 24 A.G.M.

In The High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side W.P.A 20866 of 2023 Kakali Rakshit -versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Dev Kumar Sharma ...For the Petitioner.

Mr. Sandipan Banerjee Mr. Ankit Sureka Mr. Sobhan Majumdar ...For the H.M.C.

Mr. Debjit Mukherjee Ms. Oindrila Chatterjee ...For the State.

Ms. Debasree Dhamali ... for the respondent no. 12.

Affidavit-of-service filed in Court today is taken on record.

The petitioner complains of illegal and unauthorized construction at the instance of the private respondents.

It has been submitted that huge constructions are being made without obtaining any sanctioned plan from the Howrah Municipal Corporation.

Learned advocate representing the private respondent no. 12 submits, upon instruction that,

construction is being made in accordance with the plan sanctioned by the Corporation. The lands in question were also amalgamated in terms of the direction passed by the Corporation.

Learned advocate representing the Corporation seeks time to take instruction in the matter. As it appears that the representation of the petitioner objecting to the illegal and unauthorized construction is pending consideration at the end of the respondent authorities, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the writ petition pending.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of by directing the Commissioner, Howrah Municipal Corportion or his delegate to consider and dispose of the representation made by the petitioner strictly in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the necessary parties including the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of communication of a copy of this order. The said respondent shall pass a reasoned order and communicate the same to all the necessary parties including the petitioner immediately thereafter. A spot inspection shall be conducted to ascertain the nature and extent of unauthorized construction. In the event the aforesaid respondent is of the considered opinion that the construction has been made either in violation of the plan sanctioned or devoid the sanction plan, then necessary steps shall be taken to deal with such unauthorized construction, in accordance with law.

The aforesaid respondent shall restrict the consideration of the representation with regard to unauthorized construction only and not enter into or decide any private dispute of the parties regarding right, title and interest in respect of the aforesaid land. It is made clear that this Court has not entered into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner and all points are left open to be decided by the aforesaid respondent at the time of consideration of the representation of the petitioner.

The petitioner is directed to forward a copy of the representation dated 18th August, 2023 to the aforesaid respondent at the time of communicating the order of the Court.

The writ petition stands disposed of.

Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties expeditiously on compliance of usual legal formalities.

( Amrita Sinha, J.)