Arijit Chakraborty v. State Of West Bengal

16.09.2022 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 4447 of 2022 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Kaliganj Police Station Case No. 94 of 2022 dated 10.02.2022 under Sections 406/420/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. And In Re : Arijit Chakravarty ...... petitioner Ms. Sreeparna Das Mr. Aniruddha Sinha Mr. Amitabrata Hait ....for the petitioner Mr. Joydeep Roy Mr. Amanul Islam ....for the State Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner was falsely implicated. The petitioner is in no way connected with the Shivam Enterprise Private Limited. She submits that, the de-facto complainant allegedly made over money to the Shivam Enterprise Private Limited through another person.

Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the materials in the case diary. Apparently, the de-facto complainant claimed to make over money the Shivam Enterprise Private Limited through another person. There is no material in the case diary, at

present, establishing any nexus between the petitioner and the Shivam Enterprise Private Limited.

In such circumstances, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once a month till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)