Sayan Modak @ Rintu Modak @ Rintu Adak v. State Of West Bengal

24.10.2025 Item No.9 Ct. No. 446 nb CRM(M) 1612 of 2025 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Singur Police Station Case No.261 of 2025 dated 19.05.2025 under Section 105 of the B.N.S. 2023.

And In the matter of: Sayan Modak @ Rintu Modak @ Rintu Adak. ...... Petitioner Mr.Abhra Mukherjee, Mr. Sauradeep Dutta, Mr. Arpayan Mukherjee, Mr. Himadree Ghosh, ....For the Petitioner Mr. Bitasok Banerjee, Mr. Dipankar Paramaniak, ...... for the State

1. Heard the submission of learned advocates appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as State.

2. The petitioner is in custody for 158 days and he is the father of the victim girl.

3. The unfortunate incident occurred because of slap given by the father. Perused the post mortem report, which prima facie shows that the death was due to the effect of the injury sustained by the girl.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances and on perusal of the statements given by the other witnesses and that the incident occurred on a spur of a moment accidentally and taken into consideration the period of detention and further in view of the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted, this court finds no reason to refuse the prayer of petitioner.

5. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the present petitioner is allowed.

6. Accordingly, petitioner shall be released upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Chandennager, Hooghly and on condition that he shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing and shall not intimidate witnesses nor tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and on further condition that the petitioner shall not enter into the jurisdiction of Singur Police Station until further orders and shall submit his address where he shall reside to the officer in charge, Singur Police Station.

7. In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the trial court, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bond without further reference to this Court before the jurisdictional Court on the dates fixed for appearance and in default, the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court

8. Thus, the application for bail in respect of petitioner is allowed.

9. Accordingly, the application being, CRM(M) 1612 of 2025 stands disposed of as allowed.

10.All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 11.Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.)