Parimal Maji v. Hooghly District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. & ORS.

22.06.2023 Ct. No. 15 adeb W.P.A. 19432 of 2016 Parimal Maji Vs.

Hooghly District Central Co-operative Bank Limited & Ors.

Mr. Ashit Kumar Chakraborty Ms. Sunanda Mohan Ghosh ...for the respondent no. 2 Mr. Ankit Sureka Mr. Biplab Das Mr. P.S. Pal ...for the respondent no. 8 The writ petition is taken up for consideration when no one appears for the petitioner and no accommodation is prayed for. However, respondent nos. 2 & 8 are represented by learned advocates.

Mr. Ashit Kumar Chakraborty, learned advocate representing the respondent no. 2, on instruction, submits that sole petitioner has died on 11th January, 2017 and after the death of the petitioner the wife of the petitioner made an application for appointment on compassionate ground and same was allowed thereby appointing the wife of the petitioner. It has further been submitted on behalf of respondent no. 2 that the writ petition has become infructuous.

In view of aforesaid submissions being made on behalf of the respondent no. 2 the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.

However, there shall be no order as to costs. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.

(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)