Sulekha Mandal v. State Of West Bengal & ORS

13.04.2022 adeb WPA 19546 of 2019 Sulekha Mondal Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. P. Bhattacharya Mr. Bidyut Baran Biswas Mr. Alok Kr. Chakraborty ...for the petitioner Mr. Biswabrata Basu Mallick Mr. Sajal Kumar Pandit ...for the State Affidavit of service as well as the notice dated 12th April, 2022 are taken on record.

The writ petition has come up in the list under the heading "To Be Mentioned" at the instance of the learned advocate representing the petitioner for non-prosecution. Mr. Bidyut Baran Biswas, learned advocate appears on behalf of the petitioner and submits on instruction that the petitioner does not want to proceed with the matter.

State respondents are represented by Mr. Sajal Kumar Pandit, learned advocate.

The prayer made on behalf of the petitioner is not seriously opposed by the learned advocate representing the State-respondents.

Considering the submission made on behalf of the petitioner the writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.

(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)