Sk Tohid v. State Of West Bengal

28.10.2025 Item No.7 Ct. No. 446 nb CRM(M) 1637 of 2025 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Nandakumar Police Station Case No.250 of 2024 dated 10.04.2024 under Sections 341/323/323/325/307/354/506/34 of the IPC. And In the matter of Sk. Tohid .

...... Petitioner Mr. Munshi Manzoor Hossain, Mr. M. Khairul, ....For the Petitioner Mr. Jaydeep Biswas, Mr. Karan Bapuli, ....For the State

1. Heard the submission of both the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the petitioners as well as for the prosecution.

2. Perused the Case Diary.

3. There existed a family dispute and a free fight ensued between the parties over which a counter case was filed after a delay of 13 days from the date of incident by the present petitioner. However, it is apparent that both parties sustained injuries. The co-accused has been granted bail and petitioiner has came on the ground of parity. The trial has commenced. However, four of the co-accused personas still at large. Therefore, considering the entire facts and circumstances and that there is remote possibility of conclusion of trial and the period of detention. This Court is inclined to allow the prayer.

4. Accordingly, petitioner shall be released upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Tamluk, Purba Medinipur

and on condition that he shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing and shall not intimidate witnesses nor tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and on further condition that the petitioner shall not enter into the jurisdiction of concerned Police Station until further orders and shall submit his address where he shall reside to the officer in charge, concerned Police Station.

5. In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the trial court, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bond without further reference to this Court before the jurisdictional Court on the dates fixed for appearance and in default, the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court

6. Thus, the application for bail in respect of petitioner is allowed.

7. Case Diary be returned.

8. Accordingly, the application being, CRM(M) 1637 of 2025 stands disposed of as allowed.

9. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 10.Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.)