Calcutta High CourtCRM(M)/1657/2025allowed

Gourav Shaw @ Arjun Shaw v. State Of West Bengal

2025-10-28Hon'Ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)2 pages

28.10.2025 Item No.8 Ct. No. 446 nb CRM(M) 1657 of 2025 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Tangra Police Station Case No.46 of 2025 dated 5.04.2025 under Sections 115(2)/105/3(5) of the B.N.S.S.

And In the matter of Gourav Shaw @ Arjun Shaw .

...... Petitioner Mr. Aniruddha Bhattacharyya, Ms. Anuskha Bose, Mr. Raunak Basak ....For the Petitioner Mr. Arijit Ganguly, Mr. Anindya Sundar Chatterjee, ....For the State

1. Heard the submission of both the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the petitioners as well as for the prosecution.

2. Perused the Case Diary.

3. The petitioner/accused is custody of 206 days.

4. Co-accused was similarly circumstances has already granted bail on 28.8.2025 by the Co-ordinate Bench. The incident happened because of assault took place between the petitioner and his family as well as victim. The victim succumbed to his injury later.

5. In view of the fact that co-accused was similarly circumstanced has already enlarged on bail, this court also inclined to pass such order granting bail in favour of the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, petitioner shall be released upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Sealdah, and on condition that he shall appear before the trial court on every date of

hearing and shall not intimidate witnesses nor tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and on further condition that the petitioner shall not enter into the jurisdiction of concerned Police Station until further orders and shall submit his address where he shall reside to the officer in charge, concerned Police Station.

7. In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the trial court, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bond without further reference to this Court before the jurisdictional Court on the dates fixed for appearance and in default, the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court

8. Thus, the application for bail in respect of petitioner is allowed.

9. Accordingly, the application being, CRM(M) 1657 of 2025 stands disposed of as allowed.

10. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 11.Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.)