Jadab Chandra Banerjee & ORS. v. State & ORS.

COST 2 of 2012 02.02.22 With CAN 3 of 2017 (Old No. CAN 11241 of 2017) Ct. No. 04 CAN 4 of 2018 (Old No. CAN 1323 of 2018) Akd The Higher and State Audit Accounts Services Association, West Bengal & Ors.

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

------- Mr. Amitava Mukherjee, Ms. Ankita Ghosh, Ms. Arpita Saha.

... for the petitioniers.

Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee.

... for the State.

Mr. Mayukh Maitra.

... for the respondents.

Learned Advocate on record of the petitioners submits, on instruction, that his clients do not intend to proceed with instant writ petition. Though the written instruction has not been filed but he has shouldered the responsibility of such statement, as according to him, the same has been communicated by his clients.

In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Consequently the connected applications are also dismissed.

(Harish Tandon, J.) (Rabindranath Samanta, J.)