Saheb Lai And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

29.09.2022.

29.

AD/KC (Allowed).

C.R.M. (A) 4713 of 2022 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Manikchak P. S. Case No.252 of 2022 dated 30.05.2022 under Sections 342/326/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the matter of : Saheb Ali & Anr.

... Petitioners.

Mr. M. Chatterjee Mr. Debapriya Majumdar ...for the Petitioners.

Mr. Arijit Ganguly Mr. Sanjib Kumar Daan .....for the State.

Petitioners submit that they have been falsely implicated. They pray for anticipatory bail. Learned lawyer for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

We have considered the materials on record including the medical papers. Injury does not appear to be life threatening. In view of the aforesaid circumstances and as investigations are complete, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the trial court and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Ajay Kumar Gupta,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)