Suman Nandy & ORS v. State Of West Bengal & ANR

11.10.2023 cm CRR 3517 of 2011 In Re : Suman Nandy & Ors.

.... petitioners.

Mr. Amitabha Shah .... for the opposite party No.2.

Mr. Narayan Prasad Agarwala Mr. Pratick Bose ... for the State.

Compliance report filed by the State be kept on record. The petitioner No.1 is present before the Court and the petitioner No.3 has expired as per the death certificate submitted by the learned advocate for the State. The petitioner No. 2 is unable to attend the Court due to his physical ailments as per the medical documents submitted by the learned advocate for the State. Let the same be kept on record. The opposite party No. 2 is present before the Court. Their personal appearance is noted and dispensed with.

The learned advocate for the State submitted a judgment delivered on 27.02.2015 in G.R. Case No. 831 of 2001 arising out of Goghat Police Station Case No. 167 of 2010 dated 03.10.2010 whereby the petitioners had been acquitted under Section 248(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Let the same be kept on record.

Under the facts and circumstances, the instant revisional application has become infructuous and accordingly disposed. Copy of the order be sent to the Department as well as learned trial court for immediate compliance.

(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)