← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/3282/2024allowed

Amjad Ali @ Anjad Ali v. The State Of West Bengal And ANR.

2024-09-27Hon'Ble Justice Soumen Sen,Hon'Ble Justice Uday Kumar2 pages

27.09.2024 Court No.29 Item No. 4 Allowed sg CRM (A) 3282 of 2024 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, in connection with Harishchandrapur Police Station Case No. 718 of 2024 dated 16.08.2024 under Sections 12 of the POCSO Act, pending before the Court of Learned Special Judge, Chanchal, Malda.

And In Re: Amjad Ali @ Anjad Ali Petitioner Mr. B. Bhattacharya Mr. S. Pakrashy For the Petitioner Ms. Minoti Gomes Mr. Sashanka Shekhar Saha For the State

1. The report as regards service filed in Court is taken on record.

2. In spite of service, the defacto complainant is not represented. 3.

Considering the materials available in the case diary, the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the nature and extent of complicity of the petitioner in the commission of alleged offence, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the present petitioner is not necessary.

4.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner namely, Amjad Ali @ Anjad Ali, shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.3000/- with two registered sureties of like amount, to the satisfaction of Arresting Officer, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Signed By :

SANJIB GHOSH High Court of Calcutta 27 th of September 2024 02:33:54 PM

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The petitioner shall meet the I.O. as and when required.

5.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.

6. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Soumen Sen, J.) (Uday Kumar, J.)